How safe are "safe" seats? A comparison of voluntary and compulsory voting

Many observers have expressed concern that low voter turnout reflects an acute shortcoming in democratic politics. One remedy, making voting compulsory, has garnered increasing attention among academics over recent years. Our article focuses on some of the technical properties of compulsory voting r...

ver mais

Principais autores: Fry, Tim R. L., Jakee, Keith, Kenneally, Martin
Outros Autores: Tribunal Superior Eleitoral
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: English
Publicado em: 2018
Assuntos:
Obter o texto integral:
id oai:bdjur.stj.jus.br.col_bdtse_4134:oai:localhost:bdtse-4448
recordtype tse
spelling oai:bdjur.stj.jus.br.col_bdtse_4134:oai:localhost:bdtse-44482024-10-14 How safe are "safe" seats? A comparison of voluntary and compulsory voting Fry, Tim R. L. Jakee, Keith Kenneally, Martin Tribunal Superior Eleitoral Voto obrigatório Sistema eleitoral Resultado Política Eleições Many observers have expressed concern that low voter turnout reflects an acute shortcoming in democratic politics. One remedy, making voting compulsory, has garnered increasing attention among academics over recent years. Our article focuses on some of the technical properties of compulsory voting rules (CVR) while ignoring the philosophical debate over wherther voting should be an obligation or a right. Using basic probability analysis, we compare a voluntary voting rule (VVR) to a compulsory one. We show that, under certain conditions, an electoral seat or district can become safer - or less competitive - with the imposition of a CVR. We also discuss some political implications of our analysis. For example, when generalized to, say, the national political system, this result implies fewer competitive seats in a CVR compared to a VVR, everything else equal. We contend that, because fewer seats will be in play in a CVR, cvrs should exhibit lower turnover attention - and resoucers - on this smaller set of competitive seats than we would expect under a VVR. 2018-04-18T17:04:12Z 2018-04-18T17:04:12Z 2009 Artigo FRY, Tim R. L; JAKEE, Keith; KENNEALLY, Martin. How safe are "safe" seats? A comparison of voluntary and compulsory Voting. Brazilian Political Science Review, São Paulo, v. 3, n. 1, p. 94-103, 2009. http://bibliotecadigital.tse.jus.br/xmlui/handle/bdtse/4448 en <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR"><img alt="Licença Creative Commons" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />Este item está licenciado com uma Licença <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR">Creative Commons Atribuição-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional</a>. 11 p.
institution TSE
collection TSE
language English
topic Voto obrigatório
Sistema eleitoral
Resultado
Política
Eleições
spellingShingle Voto obrigatório
Sistema eleitoral
Resultado
Política
Eleições
Fry, Tim R. L.
Jakee, Keith
Kenneally, Martin
How safe are "safe" seats? A comparison of voluntary and compulsory voting
description Many observers have expressed concern that low voter turnout reflects an acute shortcoming in democratic politics. One remedy, making voting compulsory, has garnered increasing attention among academics over recent years. Our article focuses on some of the technical properties of compulsory voting rules (CVR) while ignoring the philosophical debate over wherther voting should be an obligation or a right. Using basic probability analysis, we compare a voluntary voting rule (VVR) to a compulsory one. We show that, under certain conditions, an electoral seat or district can become safer - or less competitive - with the imposition of a CVR. We also discuss some political implications of our analysis. For example, when generalized to, say, the national political system, this result implies fewer competitive seats in a CVR compared to a VVR, everything else equal. We contend that, because fewer seats will be in play in a CVR, cvrs should exhibit lower turnover attention - and resoucers - on this smaller set of competitive seats than we would expect under a VVR.
author2 Tribunal Superior Eleitoral
format Artigo
author Fry, Tim R. L.
Jakee, Keith
Kenneally, Martin
title How safe are "safe" seats? A comparison of voluntary and compulsory voting
title_short How safe are "safe" seats? A comparison of voluntary and compulsory voting
title_full How safe are "safe" seats? A comparison of voluntary and compulsory voting
title_fullStr How safe are "safe" seats? A comparison of voluntary and compulsory voting
title_full_unstemmed How safe are "safe" seats? A comparison of voluntary and compulsory voting
title_sort how safe are "safe" seats? a comparison of voluntary and compulsory voting
publishDate 2018
url http://bibliotecadigital.tse.jus.br/xmlui/handle/bdtse/4448
_version_ 1812917477758205952
score 12,587216